PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KROG.L vs. METU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KROG.L vs. METU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) and Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KROG.L achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly lower than METU.L's 19.26% return.


KROG.L

1D
0.42%
1M
0.42%
YTD
15.55%
6M
13.48%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
-1.99%
5Y*
10Y*

METU.L

1D
-1.70%
1M
15.94%
YTD
19.26%
6M
13.72%
1Y
43.71%
3Y*
26.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROG.L vs. METU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
KROG.L
Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
15.55%0.36%-6.89%-26.89%-17.88%
METU.L
Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc
19.26%10.47%21.99%66.81%-24.07%

Correlation

The correlation between KROG.L and METU.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2022

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between KROG.L and METU.L has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KROG.L vs. METU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROG.L
KROG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KROG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

METU.L
METU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
METU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
METU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
METU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
METU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROG.L vs. METU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) and Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KROG.LMETU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.42

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.05

3.33

-0.28

KROG.L vs. METU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KROG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the METU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KROG.L and METU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KROG.LMETU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.78

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.77

-1.22

Drawdowns

KROG.L vs. METU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KROG.L drawdown since its inception was -51.38%, which is greater than METU.L's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROG.L and METU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KROG.LMETU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.38%

-32.01%

-19.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-30.55%

+22.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.00%

-32.01%

+4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.55%

-2.70%

-35.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.39%

-9.60%

-24.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

13.08%

-8.96%

Volatility

KROG.L vs. METU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) is 5.64%, while Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that KROG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KROG.LMETU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

7.66%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

17.74%

-5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

24.44%

-8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

27.11%

-7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

27.11%

-7.64%

KROG.L vs. METU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KROG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than METU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

KROG.L vs. METU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KROG.L nor METU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KROG.L and METU.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, METU.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

METU.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROG.L.

KROG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while METU.L tracks Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROG.L and 0.30% for METU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KROG.L and METU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer