METU.L vs. CBUT.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L) and iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE).
METU.L and CBUT.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METU.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2022. CBUT.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Capped. It was launched on Sep 27, 2022. Both METU.L and CBUT.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
METU.L vs. CBUT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
METU.L vs. CBUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METU.L Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc | -13.84% | 10.47% | 21.99% | 66.81% | -13.01% |
CBUT.DE iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -11.44% | 19.06% | 7.53% | 228.71% | -35.43% |
Different Trading Currencies
METU.L is traded in GBP, while CBUT.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CBUT.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METU.L achieves a -13.84% return, which is significantly lower than CBUT.DE's -11.44% return.
METU.L
- 1D
- 3.66%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- -13.84%
- 6M
- -19.03%
- 1Y
- 14.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUT.DE
- 1D
- 4.57%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -11.44%
- 6M
- -29.02%
- 1Y
- 50.75%
- 3Y*
- 32.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
METU.L vs. CBUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
METU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUT.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
METU.L vs. CBUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
METU.L
CBUT.DE
METU.L vs. CBUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L) and iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METU.L | CBUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.94 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 1.51 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.04 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 2.17 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METU.L | CBUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.94 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.47 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between METU.L and CBUT.DE is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
METU.L vs. CBUT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither METU.L nor CBUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
METU.L vs. CBUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum CBUT.DE drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU.L and CBUT.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| METU.L | CBUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -53.95% | +21.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.65% | -43.09% | +13.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -40.56% | +14.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -19.81% | +10.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.60% | 20.45% | -8.85% |
Volatility
METU.L vs. CBUT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L) is 6.89%, while iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) has a volatility of 14.59%. This indicates that METU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| METU.L | CBUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 14.59% | -7.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 40.06% | -21.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.52% | 53.59% | -27.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.04% | 60.63% | -33.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.04% | 60.63% | -33.59% |