METU.L vs. XNAS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L).
METU.L and XNAS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METU.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2022. XNAS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. Both METU.L and XNAS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
METU.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
METU.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METU.L Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc | -13.84% | 10.47% | 21.99% | 66.81% | -11.10% |
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -3.56% | 11.29% | 28.81% | 48.59% | -8.32% |
Different Trading Currencies
METU.L is traded in GBP, while XNAS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XNAS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METU.L achieves a -13.84% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.L's -3.56% return.
METU.L
- 1D
- 3.66%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- -13.84%
- 6M
- -19.03%
- 1Y
- 14.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.L
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- -3.56%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 20.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
METU.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
METU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
METU.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank
METU.L
XNAS.L
METU.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METU.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 1.10 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 1.62 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.22 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 2.54 | -2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 7.41 | -6.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METU.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.10 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.06 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between METU.L and XNAS.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
METU.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither METU.L nor XNAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
METU.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than XNAS.L's maximum drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU.L and XNAS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| METU.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -22.92% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.65% | -12.62% | -17.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -7.52% | -19.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -3.12% | -6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.60% | 2.95% | +8.65% |
Volatility
METU.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) at 5.85%. This indicates that METU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| METU.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 5.85% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 12.17% | +6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.52% | 19.66% | +6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.04% | 19.03% | +8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.04% | 19.03% | +8.01% |