KRMA vs. QARP
KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - KRMA tracks the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRMA returned 10.10%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KRMA charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
KRMA vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.07% return.
KRMA
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 19.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
QARP
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- —
KRMA vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 10.25% | 13.98% | 18.12% | 22.08% | -18.96% | 27.71% | 17.53% | 30.07% | -4.38% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.07% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRMA and QARP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between KRMA and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
KRMA vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KRMA
QARP
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
KRMA
QARP
Financial Services
KRMA
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
KRMA
QARP
Healthcare
KRMA
QARP
Communication Services
KRMA
QARP
Industrials
KRMA
QARP
Consumer Defensive
KRMA
QARP
Energy
KRMA
QARP
Basic Materials
KRMA
QARP
Real Estate
KRMA
QARP
Utilities
KRMA
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRMA vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
KRMA
QARP
KRMA vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRMA | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.40 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 3.25 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 14.45 | -6.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRMA vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRMA | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.16% | -35.44% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -7.26% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -15.65% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -22.75% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -0.63% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -4.39% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 1.63% | +0.72% |
Volatility
KRMA vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRMA | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.84% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 8.25% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 10.60% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 15.54% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 19.55% | -1.08% |
KRMA vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
KRMA vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than QARP's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 2.38% | 2.59% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 0.86% | 1.07% | 0.96% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 1.21% | 0.96% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KRMA and QARP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRMA has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to QARP (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 11.95% vs 10.10% for KRMA. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 10.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.
KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.03% for QARP.
KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRMA and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer