PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRMA vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRMA vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.07% return.


KRMA

1D
-0.74%
1M
2.00%
6M
9.15%
YTD
10.25%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
13.60%

QARP

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.08%
6M
9.01%
YTD
12.07%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMA vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
10.25%13.98%18.12%22.08%-18.96%27.71%17.53%30.07%-4.38%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.07%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMA and QARP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.88

The correlation between KRMA and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

KRMA vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KRMA
QARP

Technology

41.0%
23.5%

Financial Services

12.5%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.6%

Healthcare

9.4%
13.9%

Communication Services

8.8%
11.3%

Industrials

5.9%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
9.6%

Energy

2.4%
5.8%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.0%

Utilities

1.0%
2.0%

Technology

KRMA
41.0%
QARP
23.5%

Financial Services

KRMA
12.5%
QARP
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

KRMA
11.1%
QARP
9.6%

Healthcare

KRMA
9.4%
QARP
13.9%

Communication Services

KRMA
8.8%
QARP
11.3%

Industrials

KRMA
5.9%
QARP
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

KRMA
3.6%
QARP
9.6%

Energy

KRMA
2.4%
QARP
5.8%

Basic Materials

KRMA
2.0%
QARP
2.3%

Real Estate

KRMA
2.0%
QARP
1.0%

Utilities

KRMA
1.0%
QARP
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRMA vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMA
KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMA vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRMAQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.25

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

14.45

-6.15

KRMA vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMA and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRMA vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMAQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.16%

-35.44%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-7.26%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-15.65%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.12%

-22.75%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-0.63%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-4.39%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.63%

+0.72%

Volatility

KRMA vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMAQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.84%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

8.25%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

10.60%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

15.54%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

19.55%

-1.08%

KRMA vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRMA vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than QARP's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
2.38%2.59%0.91%1.16%0.86%1.07%0.96%1.52%1.82%1.21%0.96%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.03%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRMA and QARP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KRMA has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to QARP (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 11.95% vs 10.10% for KRMA. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 10.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.03% for QARP.

KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRMA and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer