PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRMA vs. IOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRMA vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KRMA having a 11.81% return and IOO slightly higher at 12.26%.


KRMA

1D
-0.90%
1M
6.32%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.13%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*

IOO

1D
-1.33%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.43%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
16.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMA vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
11.81%13.98%18.12%22.08%-18.96%27.71%17.53%30.07%-3.89%22.92%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
12.26%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%18.61%30.01%-6.22%23.56%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMA and IOO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2016

0.85

The correlation between KRMA and IOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

KRMA vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KRMA
IOO

Technology

41.8%
46.2%

Financial Services

11.5%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
8.4%

Communication Services

9.4%
11.0%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.4%

Industrials

7.1%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
5.6%

Energy

2.7%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.2%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.7%

Utilities

0.9%
0.5%

Technology

KRMA
41.8%
IOO
46.2%

Financial Services

KRMA
11.5%
IOO
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

KRMA
10.8%
IOO
8.4%

Communication Services

KRMA
9.4%
IOO
11.0%

Healthcare

KRMA
8.7%
IOO
8.4%

Industrials

KRMA
7.1%
IOO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

KRMA
3.5%
IOO
5.6%

Energy

KRMA
2.7%
IOO
3.6%

Real Estate

KRMA
1.9%
IOO
0.2%

Basic Materials

KRMA
1.6%
IOO
1.7%

Utilities

KRMA
0.9%
IOO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRMA vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMA
KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMA vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRMAIOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.50

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.87

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

17.94

-4.19

KRMA vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMA and IOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRMAIOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.84

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.98

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.39

+0.36

Drawdowns

KRMA vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and IOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMAIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.16%

-55.85%

+19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-9.94%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-19.19%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.12%

-23.52%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.33%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-11.27%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.14%

-0.11%

Volatility

KRMA vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is 3.12%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that KRMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMAIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

3.81%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

10.59%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

13.54%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

17.04%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.51%

17.78%

+0.73%

KRMA vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRMA vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than IOO's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.82%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
2.32%2.59%0.91%1.16%0.86%1.07%0.96%1.52%1.82%1.21%0.96%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRMA and IOO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IOO has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to KRMA (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs IOO's -55.85%.

On 5-year performance, IOO leads with 16.68% vs 10.89% for KRMA. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.68% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.

KRMA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.40% for IOO.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRMA and IOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer