KRMA vs. DLN
KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - KRMA tracks the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index while DLN tracks the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRMA returned 10.89%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KRMA charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
KRMA vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return.
KRMA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
KRMA vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 11.81% | 13.98% | 18.12% | 22.08% | -18.96% | 27.71% | 17.53% | 30.07% | -3.89% | 22.92% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 28.91% | -5.82% | 18.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRMA and DLN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between KRMA and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
KRMA vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KRMA
DLN
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
KRMA
DLN
Financial Services
KRMA
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
KRMA
DLN
Communication Services
KRMA
DLN
Healthcare
KRMA
DLN
Industrials
KRMA
DLN
Consumer Defensive
KRMA
DLN
Energy
KRMA
DLN
Real Estate
KRMA
DLN
Basic Materials
KRMA
DLN
Utilities
KRMA
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRMA vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
KRMA
DLN
KRMA vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KRMA | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.69 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 15.59 | -1.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KRMA | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.53 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.93 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.53 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
KRMA vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRMA | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.16% | -57.84% | +21.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -6.10% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -13.71% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -16.26% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.51% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -7.52% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.44% | +0.59% |
Volatility
KRMA vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that KRMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRMA | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.17% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | 6.77% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 8.87% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 13.26% | +3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 16.16% | +2.35% |
KRMA vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
KRMA vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 2.32% | 2.59% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 0.86% | 1.07% | 0.96% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 1.21% | 0.96% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KRMA and DLN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRMA has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 5-year performance, DLN leads with 12.22% vs 10.89% for KRMA. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.
KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.79% for DLN.
KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRMA and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer