PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRE vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRE vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRE achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.


KRE

1D
0.50%
1M
2.79%
6M
12.47%
YTD
17.11%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
24.43%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
9.31%

MSTZ

1D
-1.53%
1M
39.32%
6M
-19.19%
YTD
-26.97%
1Y
264.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRE vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
17.11%10.21%7.29%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-26.97%-38.95%-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between KRE and MSTZ is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRE vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRE
KRE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
KRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
KRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRE vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KREMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.86

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.64

5.59

-1.95

KRE vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRE and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRE vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRE drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRE and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KREMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.54%

-99.38%

+30.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.95%

-84.89%

+69.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-97.51%

+95.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.80%

-94.53%

+72.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

43.41%

-37.65%

Volatility

KRE vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) is 5.65%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that KRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KREMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

56.46%

-50.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

135.20%

-118.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.12%

148.41%

-125.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.74%

171.17%

-141.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.75%

171.17%

-139.42%

KRE vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRE vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

KRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
2.13%2.45%2.59%2.99%2.51%1.97%2.78%2.21%2.48%1.40%1.40%1.80%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRE and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to KRE (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRE dropped -68.54% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 22.19% for KRE. On fees, KRE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KRE has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 22.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KRE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

KRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

KRE is categorized as Financials Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KRE and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRE and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer