PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRBN vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRBN vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRBN achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.44% return.


KRBN

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-5.48%
6M
-5.75%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
0.87%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.76%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
18.44%
6M
17.45%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRBN vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KRBN
KraneShares Global Carbon ETF
-5.48%23.11%-13.56%8.01%-12.75%107.69%25.03%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.44%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%19.55%

Correlation

The correlation between KRBN and SCHD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.18

The correlation between KRBN and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRBN vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRBN
KRBN Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
KRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRBN vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRBNSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.43

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

5.76

-5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.31

13.87

-12.56

KRBN vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRBN Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRBN and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRBN vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRBN drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRBN and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRBNSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.42%

-33.37%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.98%

-4.61%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.34%

-16.13%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.42%

-16.85%

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.84%

-1.87%

-11.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.12%

-3.31%

-12.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.79%

1.91%

+7.88%

Volatility

KRBN vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.12%. This indicates that KRBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRBNSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

3.12%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.86%

7.74%

+9.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.17%

11.09%

+8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.06%

14.36%

+13.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.54%

16.70%

+11.84%

KRBN vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRBN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRBN vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

KRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than SCHD's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRBN
KraneShares Global Carbon ETF
2.01%1.90%7.10%7.60%22.91%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.28%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRBN and SCHD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KRBN has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to SCHD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRBN dropped -36.42% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 8.70% vs 6.01% for KRBN. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KRBN.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.01% for KRBN.

KRBN is categorized as Commodities, while SCHD is Dividend. KRBN tracks IHS Markit Global Carbon Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KRBN and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRBN and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer