PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KR vs. MNST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KR vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 21.08% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has underperformed MNST with an annualized return of 8.32%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively higher 13.79% annualized return.


KR

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
4.64%
6M
3.46%
1Y
1.54%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
8.32%

MNST

1D
0.87%
1M
8.03%
YTD
21.08%
6M
25.50%
1Y
45.75%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
13.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KR vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KR
The Kroger Co.
4.64%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
21.08%45.87%-8.77%13.48%5.72%3.85%45.52%29.11%-22.23%42.74%

Correlation

The correlation between KR and MNST is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.15

Fundamentals

EPS

KR:

$1.20

MNST:

$2.06

PE Ratio

KR:

54.13

MNST:

45.05

PEG Ratio

KR:

7.85

MNST:

3.52

PS Ratio

KR:

0.29

MNST:

10.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

KR:

$147.23B

MNST:

$8.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KR:

$33.42B

MNST:

$4.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

KR:

$5.29B

MNST:

$2.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KR vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MNST
MNST Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNST Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNST Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KR vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRMNSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.35

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

2.60

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

7.37

-7.22

KR vs. MNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and MNST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KR vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, roughly equal to the maximum MNST drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and MNST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMNSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-69.17%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.44%

-17.70%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-26.04%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-26.62%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-30.42%

-15.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.95%

0.00%

-13.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-20.66%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.13%

6.22%

+3.91%

Volatility

KR vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 5.50%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMNSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

5.50%

+3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

20.03%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.54%

26.43%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.85%

24.60%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.94%

26.25%

+2.69%

Dividends

KR vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.16%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KR vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.86B
2.35B
(KR) Total Revenue
(MNST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KR vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Kroger Co. and Monster Beverage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.0%
55.0%
Portfolio components
KR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 7.12B and revenue of 33.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

MNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

KR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of -1.54B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

MNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

KR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of -1.32B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.

MNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KR and MNST have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KR has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to MNST (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs MNST's -69.17%.

MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KR and MNST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer