PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KR vs. KMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KR vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 8.32%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.


KR

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
4.64%
6M
3.46%
1Y
1.54%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
8.32%

KMB

1D
0.74%
1M
6.86%
YTD
4.05%
6M
1.77%
1Y
-19.86%
3Y*
-4.95%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KR vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KR
The Kroger Co.
4.64%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.05%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KR and KMB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984

0.26

Fundamentals

EPS

KR:

$1.20

KMB:

$5.93

PE Ratio

KR:

54.13

KMB:

17.26

PEG Ratio

KR:

7.85

KMB:

2.98

PS Ratio

KR:

0.29

KMB:

2.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

KR:

$147.23B

KMB:

$16.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KR:

$33.42B

KMB:

$5.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

KR:

$5.29B

KMB:

$3.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KR vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KR vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRKMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.87

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

-0.67

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

-1.03

+1.18

KR vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and KMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KR vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and KMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRKMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-36.97%

-29.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.44%

-29.60%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-34.06%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-34.06%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-34.06%

-12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.95%

-26.52%

+12.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-8.85%

-13.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.13%

19.43%

-9.30%

Volatility

KR vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRKMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

8.42%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

16.67%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.54%

25.77%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.85%

20.19%

+6.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.94%

21.07%

+7.87%

Dividends

KR vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than KMB's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.97%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.16%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%

Financials

KR vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.86B
4.16B
(KR) Total Revenue
(KMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KR vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Kroger Co. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.0%
36.9%
Portfolio components
KR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 7.12B and revenue of 33.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

KR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of -1.54B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

KR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of -1.32B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KR and KMB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KR has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs KMB's -36.97%.

KR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KR and KMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer