KR vs. BAC
KR (The Kroger Co.) and BAC (Bank of America Corporation) are both stocks. KR operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while BAC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, KR returned 6.90%/yr vs 18.70%/yr for BAC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KR vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a -9.84% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's 6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 6.90%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.70% annualized return.
KR
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -17.09%
- YTD
- -9.84%
- 6M
- -9.56%
- 1Y
- -20.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
BAC
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- 12.15%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 4.55%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 18.70%
KR vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KR The Kroger Co. | -9.84% | 4.25% | 36.91% | 4.99% | 0.44% | 45.41% | 11.90% | 7.90% | 2.08% | -18.97% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 6.22% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between KR and BAC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1986 | 0.24 |
The correlation between KR and BAC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KR:
$34.29B
BAC:
$425.54B
KR:
$1.64
BAC:
$4.19
KR:
33.97
BAC:
13.68
KR:
41.57
BAC:
5.49
KR:
0.24
BAC:
2.48
KR:
5.29
BAC:
1.54
KR:
$148.65B
BAC:
$174.85B
KR:
$34.46B
BAC:
$110.47B
KR:
$5.60B
BAC:
$41.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KR vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank
KR
BAC
KR vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KR | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.24 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 1.67 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.99 | 4.29 | -6.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KR vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and BAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KR | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.81% | -93.10% | +26.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | -17.93% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -27.51% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.07% | -46.64% | +15.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.25% | -48.95% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.85% | 0.00% | -25.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -28.28% | +5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.52% | 6.96% | +3.56% |
Volatility
KR vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.85%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KR | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 5.85% | +5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.95% | 16.71% | +5.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.36% | 21.69% | +5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 26.81% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.10% | 30.69% | -1.59% |
Dividends
KR vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than BAC's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.65% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
KR The Kroger Co. | 2.51% | 2.14% | 2.00% | 2.41% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 1.93% | 1.79% | 1.30% | 0.94% |
Financials
KR vs. BAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KR vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison
KR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 10.63B and revenue of 46.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.
BAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.94B and revenue of 30.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.6%.
KR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 46.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
BAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 10.40B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.
KR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of 903.00M and revenue of 46.12B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
BAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 8.58B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KR and BAC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KR has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to BAC (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs BAC's -93.10%.
BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KR and BAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer