PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KQQQ vs. NFXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KQQQ vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 26.00% return.


KQQQ

1D
-1.78%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
12.10%
6M
10.72%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFXS

1D
1.44%
1M
23.02%
YTD
26.00%
6M
25.81%
1Y
69.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KQQQ vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
12.10%16.64%11.14%
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
26.00%-8.56%-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and NFXS is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024

-0.38

The correlation between KQQQ and NFXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (all time) to -0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ
KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NFXS
NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KQQQNFXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.24

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.68

6.13

-0.45

KQQQ vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and NFXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KQQQNFXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.15%

-50.37%

+24.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-31.31%

+14.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.92%

-11.63%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-31.89%

+27.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

11.44%

-6.10%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) at 7.76%. This indicates that KQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KQQQNFXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

7.76%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

26.25%

-10.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.53%

33.78%

-14.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.72%

34.63%

-10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.72%

34.63%

-10.91%

KQQQ vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

KQQQ vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.59%, more than NFXS's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
14.59%12.01%2.48%
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
2.81%3.53%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


KQQQ and NFXS have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KQQQ has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to NFXS (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 69.91% vs 30.24% for KQQQ. On fees, KQQQ is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 69.91% return vs 30.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KQQQ is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 14.59%, compared with 2.81% for NFXS.

KQQQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KQQQ and 1.03% for NFXS.

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KQQQ and NFXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer