PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KQQQ vs. KGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KQQQ vs. KGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly higher than KGLD's -6.60% return.


KQQQ

1D
0.57%
1M
0.50%
6M
14.00%
YTD
15.18%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KGLD

1D
1.39%
1M
-3.93%
6M
-12.52%
YTD
-6.60%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KQQQ vs. KGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
15.18%12.81%
KGLD
Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF
-6.60%29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and KGLD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. KGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ
KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

KGLD
KGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
KGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
KGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. KGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KQQQKGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.15

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.71

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

1.70

+3.49

KQQQ vs. KGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the KGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and KGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. KGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, smaller than the maximum KGLD drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and KGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KQQQKGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.15%

-28.07%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-28.07%

+10.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-26.90%

+22.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-8.06%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

11.69%

-6.26%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. KGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) is 6.53%, while Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that KQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KQQQKGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

7.04%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.21%

25.13%

-8.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.61%

28.97%

-9.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.56%

28.75%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.56%

28.75%

-5.19%

KQQQ vs. KGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than KGLD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

KQQQ vs. KGLD - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.87%, less than KGLD's 15.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
KGLD
Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF
15.45%4.59%0.00%
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
14.87%12.01%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


KQQQ and KGLD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGLD has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to KQQQ (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs KGLD's -28.07%.

On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 28.12% vs 19.85% for KGLD. On fees, KQQQ is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, KQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 28.12% return vs 19.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KQQQ is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.

KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 15.45%, compared with 14.87% for KQQQ.

KQQQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while KGLD is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KQQQ and 1.00% for KGLD.

KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KQQQ and KGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer