PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KQQQ vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KQQQ vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a 19.80% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.


KQQQ

1D
-0.52%
1M
11.20%
YTD
19.80%
6M
17.45%
1Y
44.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KQQQ vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
19.80%16.64%11.46%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and IBIC is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ
KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KQQQIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

2.24

-0.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

17.27

-14.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

67.45

-58.88

KQQQ vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KQQQIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

5.05

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

3.49

-2.34

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KQQQIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.15%

-0.90%

-25.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-0.26%

-17.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.13%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-0.10%

-4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

0.07%

+5.15%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that KQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KQQQIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

0.33%

+5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

0.67%

+13.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.13%

0.90%

+17.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.42%

1.58%

+21.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

1.58%

+21.84%

KQQQ vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

KQQQ vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
13.66%12.01%2.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KQQQ and IBIC have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KQQQ has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 44.63% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 44.63% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.66%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

KQQQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KQQQ and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KQQQ and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer