KPRO vs. XMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR).
KPRO and XMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KPRO is an actively managed fund by KraneShares. It was launched on Feb 7, 2024. XMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 16, 2023.
Performance
KPRO vs. XMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KPRO vs. XMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -3.52% | 7.79% | 12.68% |
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 1.40% | 10.30% | 9.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPRO achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than XMAR's 1.40% return.
KPRO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -9.99%
- 1Y
- -0.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMAR
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KPRO vs. XMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPRO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KPRO vs. XMAR — Risk / Return Rank
KPRO
XMAR
KPRO vs. XMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KPRO | XMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | 1.30 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | 1.96 | -1.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.47 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 1.52 | -1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 10.40 | -10.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KPRO | XMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 1.30 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 1.90 | -0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between KPRO and XMAR is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KPRO vs. XMAR - Dividend Comparison
KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while XMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 2.75% | 2.65% | 3.70% |
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KPRO vs. XMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPRO drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, which is greater than XMAR's maximum drawdown of -7.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPRO and XMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPRO | XMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.01% | -7.29% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -6.79% | -4.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.43% | -0.27% | -10.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -0.32% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 1.00% | +3.09% |
Volatility
KPRO vs. XMAR - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) at 1.73%. This indicates that KPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KPRO | XMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 1.73% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.75% | 2.12% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.51% | 7.86% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 5.64% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 5.64% | +2.20% |