PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
XMAR vs. XSEP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XMAR and XSEP is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

XMAR vs. XSEP

Last updated May 31, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP).

XMAR and XSEP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 16, 2023. XSEP is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Sep 20, 2022.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMAR or XSEP.

Performance

XMAR vs. XSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XMAR:

1.26

XSEP:

0.69

Sortino Ratio

XMAR:

1.76

XSEP:

1.06

Omega Ratio

XMAR:

1.34

XSEP:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

XMAR:

1.39

XSEP:

0.68

Martin Ratio

XMAR:

8.33

XSEP:

3.60

Ulcer Index

XMAR:

1.22%

XSEP:

1.75%

Daily Std Dev

XMAR:

8.57%

XSEP:

9.30%

Max Drawdown

XMAR:

-7.29%

XSEP:

-9.21%

Current Drawdown

XMAR:

-0.17%

XSEP:

-0.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAR achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly higher than XSEP's 2.34% return.

XMAR

YTD

3.78%

1M

2.67%

6M

4.07%

1Y

10.70%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XSEP

YTD

2.34%

1M

3.34%

6M

1.85%

1Y

6.38%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

XMAR vs. XSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMAR and XSEP have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

XMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March
XSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XMAR vs. XSEP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMAR is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMAR is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMAR is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMAR is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMAR is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMAR is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
XSEP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XSEP is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XSEP is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XSEP is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XSEP is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XSEP is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XSEP is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XMAR vs. XSEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current XMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the XSEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAR and XSEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

XMAR vs. XSEP - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMAR nor XSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XMAR vs. XSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAR drawdown since its inception was -7.29%, smaller than the maximum XSEP drawdown of -9.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAR and XSEP.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

XMAR vs. XSEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) is 1.90%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that XMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...