XMAR vs. UJB
XMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March) and UJB (ProShares Ultra High Yield) are both exchange-traded funds - XMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while UJB is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. XMAR is actively managed, while UJB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMAR returned 11.18%/yr vs 11.65%/yr for UJB. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UJB.
Performance
XMAR vs. UJB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMAR achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly higher than UJB's 1.26% return.
XMAR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 13.17%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UJB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 6.40%
XMAR vs. UJB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 6.66% | 10.30% | 10.10% | 10.30% |
UJB ProShares Ultra High Yield | 1.26% | 12.22% | 9.41% | 18.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMAR and UJB is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XMAR and UJB shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMAR vs. UJB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMAR
UJB
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XMAR
UJB
-
Financial Services
XMAR
UJB
-
Communication Services
XMAR
UJB
-
Consumer Cyclical
XMAR
UJB
-
Healthcare
XMAR
UJB
-
Industrials
XMAR
UJB
-
Consumer Defensive
XMAR
UJB
-
Energy
XMAR
UJB
Utilities
XMAR
UJB
-
Real Estate
XMAR
UJB
-
Basic Materials
XMAR
UJB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMAR vs. UJB — Risk / Return Rank
XMAR
UJB
XMAR vs. UJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMAR | UJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.40 | 1.29 | +3.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.61 | 1.92 | +5.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.22 | 1.24 | +0.98 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.04 | 1.85 | +7.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 69.02 | 7.91 | +61.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMAR | UJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40 | 1.29 | +3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.13 | 0.33 | +1.80 |
Drawdowns
XMAR vs. UJB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMAR drawdown since its inception was -7.29%, smaller than the maximum UJB drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAR and UJB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMAR | UJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -40.14% | +32.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.48% | -5.01% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.29% | -9.47% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.40% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -6.17% | +5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 1.17% | -0.98% |
Volatility
XMAR vs. UJB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) is 0.66%, while ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that XMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UJB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMAR | UJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 2.34% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 5.75% | -3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01% | 7.28% | -4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.56% | 14.66% | -9.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.56% | 18.28% | -12.72% |
XMAR vs. UJB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than UJB's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMAR vs. UJB - Dividend Comparison
XMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UJB ProShares Ultra High Yield | 3.34% | 2.61% | 3.02% | 3.92% | 0.05% | 0.63% | 2.88% | 3.95% | 3.22% | 2.67% | 2.35% | 3.62% |
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMAR and UJB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UJB has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to XMAR (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAR dropped -7.29% vs UJB's -40.14%.
On 3-year performance, UJB leads with 11.65% vs 11.18% for XMAR. On fees, XMAR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UJB has performed better with a 11.65% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMAR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UJB.
UJB has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.00% for XMAR.
XMAR is categorized as Options Trading, while UJB is Leveraged Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XMAR and 0.95% for UJB.
XMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMAR and UJB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer