KPHO vs. VWO
KPHO (KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - KPHO tracks the Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index while VWO tracks the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KPHO charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
KPHO vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -4.20% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 12.18% return.
KPHO
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- -4.20%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VWO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- 29.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
KPHO vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | -4.20% | 9.78% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 12.18% | 1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPHO and VWO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPHO vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
KPHO
VWO
KPHO vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KPHO | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.27 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
KPHO vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPHO | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -67.68% | +53.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.49% | -1.44% | -8.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -15.82% | +9.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility
KPHO vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPHO | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.96% | 15.89% | +13.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.96% | 17.36% | +11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.96% | 19.20% | +9.76% |
KPHO vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPHO vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.85%, more than VWO's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | 10.85% | 10.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.41% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPHO and VWO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.
KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 10.85%, compared with 2.41% for VWO.
KPHO tracks Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 0.08% for VWO.
Find the right allocation for KPHO and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer