KPHO vs. ROAM
KPHO (KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF) and ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - KPHO tracks the Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index while ROAM tracks the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KPHO charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ROAM.
Performance
KPHO vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 23.81% return.
KPHO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROAM
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 24.22%
- 1Y
- 41.15%
- 3Y*
- 24.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
KPHO vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | -6.02% | 9.46% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 23.81% | 1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPHO and ROAM is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPHO vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank
KPHO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROAM
KPHO vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KPHO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KPHO vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum ROAM drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and ROAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPHO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -45.47% | +31.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | -4.15% | -7.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -11.09% | +4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.79% | — |
Volatility
KPHO vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPHO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.87% | 16.66% | +11.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 15.60% | +12.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 17.95% | +9.92% |
KPHO vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPHO vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison
KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than ROAM's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | 11.06% | 10.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.56% | 3.17% | 4.15% | 5.40% | 5.23% | 4.22% | 3.04% | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPHO and ROAM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.
KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 11.06%, compared with 2.56% for ROAM.
KPHO tracks Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index, while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 0.44% for ROAM.
Find the right allocation for KPHO and ROAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer