KPHO vs. ROAM
KPHO (KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF) and ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - KPHO tracks the Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index while ROAM tracks the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KPHO charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ROAM.
Performance
KPHO vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -6.83% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 26.83% return.
KPHO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -6.83%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROAM
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 26.83%
- 6M
- 28.99%
- 1Y
- 51.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
KPHO vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | -6.83% | 9.78% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 26.83% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPHO and ROAM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPHO vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank
KPHO
ROAM
KPHO vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KPHO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.38 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
KPHO vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum ROAM drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and ROAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPHO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -45.47% | +31.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.98% | -1.60% | -10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -11.13% | +5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
KPHO vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPHO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.80% | 14.93% | +13.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 15.23% | +13.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 17.87% | +10.93% |
KPHO vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPHO vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison
KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.16%, more than ROAM's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | 11.16% | 10.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.50% | 3.17% | 4.15% | 5.40% | 5.23% | 4.22% | 3.04% | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPHO and ROAM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.
KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 11.16%, compared with 2.50% for ROAM.
KPHO tracks Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index, while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 0.44% for ROAM.
Find the right allocation for KPHO and ROAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer