KPHO vs. RNEM
KPHO (KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF) and RNEM (First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - KPHO tracks the Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index while RNEM tracks the Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KPHO charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RNEM.
Performance
KPHO vs. RNEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -9.36% return, which is significantly lower than RNEM's 1.18% return.
KPHO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- 6M
- -12.57%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNEM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- —
KPHO vs. RNEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | -9.36% | 9.46% |
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF | 1.18% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPHO and RNEM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPHO vs. RNEM — Risk / Return Rank
KPHO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RNEM
KPHO vs. RNEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KPHO | RNEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KPHO vs. RNEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.37%, smaller than the maximum RNEM drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and RNEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPHO | RNEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -38.38% | +24.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.37% | -4.94% | -9.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -9.25% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility
KPHO vs. RNEM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPHO | RNEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.87% | 12.50% | +14.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 14.48% | +12.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 17.17% | +9.70% |
KPHO vs. RNEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than RNEM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPHO vs. RNEM - Dividend Comparison
KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.47%, more than RNEM's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | 11.47% | 10.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF | 2.35% | 2.75% | 3.45% | 1.63% | 2.99% | 3.20% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 2.85% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPHO and RNEM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RNEM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RNEM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.
KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 11.47%, compared with 2.35% for RNEM.
KPHO tracks Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index, while RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 0.75% for RNEM.
Find the right allocation for KPHO and RNEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer