PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOMP vs. XTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOMP vs. XTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 56.08% return.


KOMP

1D
-2.06%
1M
11.27%
YTD
23.59%
6M
21.48%
1Y
46.75%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*

XTL

1D
-3.76%
1M
5.66%
YTD
56.08%
6M
62.03%
1Y
130.19%
3Y*
48.87%
5Y*
19.82%
10Y*
16.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOMP vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
23.59%19.74%10.05%20.09%-32.21%3.67%61.28%37.12%-10.32%
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
56.08%44.95%34.89%-1.17%-19.18%21.58%22.46%12.51%-11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and XTL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.81

The correlation between KOMP and XTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOMP vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOMP
XTL

Technology

33.0%
61.4%

Industrials

28.2%

-

Healthcare

11.6%

-

Financial Services

5.8%

-

Communication Services

5.6%
36.1%

Utilities

5.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%

-

Basic Materials

2.9%

-

Energy

2.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.2%

-

Real Estate

-

2.6%

Technology

KOMP
33.0%
XTL
61.4%

Industrials

KOMP
28.2%
XTL

-

Healthcare

KOMP
11.6%
XTL

-

Financial Services

KOMP
5.8%
XTL

-

Communication Services

KOMP
5.6%
XTL
36.1%

Utilities

KOMP
5.2%
XTL

-

Consumer Cyclical

KOMP
4.7%
XTL

-

Basic Materials

KOMP
2.9%
XTL

-

Energy

KOMP
2.8%
XTL

-

Consumer Defensive

KOMP
0.2%
XTL

-

Real Estate

KOMP

-

XTL
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOMP vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOMP
KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

XTL
XTL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
XTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOMP vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KOMPXTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.64

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

8.91

-5.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

40.85

-30.98

KOMP vs. XTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the XTL Sharpe Ratio of 4.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and XTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KOMPXTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

4.51

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.79

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.53

-0.01

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than XTL's maximum drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and XTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOMPXTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-37.01%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-14.70%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-22.79%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

-37.01%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-3.76%

+1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.69%

-9.77%

-11.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

3.20%

+1.55%

Volatility

KOMP vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is 7.43%, while SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that KOMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOMPXTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

8.96%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.95%

22.92%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.15%

29.07%

-5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

25.10%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.02%

23.53%

+3.49%

KOMP vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

KOMP vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than XTL's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
1.43%1.84%1.04%1.27%1.47%1.44%0.69%0.81%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
0.83%1.05%0.62%0.80%0.74%1.25%0.88%0.92%1.90%2.08%1.11%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOMP and XTL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTL has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to KOMP (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs XTL's -37.01%.

On 5-year performance, XTL leads with 19.82% vs 3.36% for KOMP. On fees, KOMP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KOMP has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XTL has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KOMP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XTL.

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.83% for XTL.

KOMP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XTL is Communications Equities. KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.35% for XTL.

XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOMP and XTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer