PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOMP vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KOMP vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KOMP vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
-0.66%19.74%10.05%20.09%-32.21%3.67%61.28%37.12%-10.32%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
8.77%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%-1.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 8.77% return.


KOMP

1D
1.34%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-4.55%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
-1.44%
10Y*

XLU

1D
0.48%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
8.77%
6M
6.26%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KOMP vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

KOMP vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOMP
KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOMP vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KOMPXLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.27

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.73

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.21

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.94

5.31

+0.63

KOMP vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and XLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KOMPXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.27

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.64

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.41

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and XLU is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KOMP vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than XLU's 2.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
1.78%1.84%1.04%1.27%1.47%1.44%0.69%0.81%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.58%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, roughly equal to the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and XLU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KOMPXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-51.98%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-9.18%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.83%

-25.26%

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.77%

-2.72%

-13.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-10.26%

-11.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

3.82%

+1.19%

Volatility

KOMP vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) at 5.09%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KOMPXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

5.09%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.05%

10.36%

+8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.46%

15.79%

+10.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.87%

17.18%

+7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.09%

19.21%

+7.88%