KOKU vs. BBUS
KOKU (Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - KOKU tracks the MSCI Kokusai Index (World ex Japan) while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KOKU returned 11.69%/yr vs 12.93%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KOKU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
KOKU vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOKU achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 8.20% return.
KOKU
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 7.33%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 25.30%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- —
KOKU vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | 7.33% | 21.45% | 19.45% | 24.23% | -17.83% | 23.84% | 40.42% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 8.20% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 41.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOKU and BBUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between KOKU and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
KOKU vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KOKU
BBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
KOKU
BBUS
Financial Services
KOKU
BBUS
Industrials
KOKU
BBUS
Communication Services
KOKU
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
KOKU
BBUS
Healthcare
KOKU
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
KOKU
BBUS
Energy
KOKU
BBUS
Basic Materials
KOKU
BBUS
Utilities
KOKU
BBUS
Real Estate
KOKU
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOKU vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
KOKU
BBUS
KOKU vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KOKU | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 2.76 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 12.62 | -0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KOKU | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.09 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.76 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.82 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
KOKU vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOKU drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOKU and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOKU | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.77% | -35.35% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -9.21% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.73% | -19.01% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.77% | -25.46% | -0.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -2.90% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -5.45% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.01% | 0.00% |
Volatility
KOKU vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 3.80%. This indicates that KOKU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOKU | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.80% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 9.37% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 12.18% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 17.06% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 19.61% | -2.77% |
KOKU vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOKU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
KOKU vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
KOKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | 1.39% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 0.55% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, KOKU and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
KOKU has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to BBUS (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOKU dropped -25.77% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.93% vs 11.69% for KOKU. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for KOKU.
KOKU has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.
KOKU tracks MSCI Kokusai Index (World ex Japan), while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KOKU and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KOKU and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer