KOID vs. HUMN

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KOID is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index, while HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill. KOID is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. Over the past year, KOID returned 46.98% vs 28.97% for HUMN. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KOID charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.

Performance

KOID vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOID achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly higher than HUMN's 6.76% return.

KOID

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -5.39%
• 6M: 14.63%
• YTD: 21.24%
• 1Y: 46.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HUMN

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -9.84%
• 6M: 1.89%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 1Y: 28.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOID vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	21.24%	23.52%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	6.76%	20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between KOID and HUMN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.87

The correlation between KOID and HUMN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOID vs. HUMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOID	HUMN
Technology	44.5%	26.6%
Industrials	30.8%	38.4%
Consumer Cyclical	18.4%	17.4%
Basic Materials	5.8%	3.5%
Communication Services	-	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KOID vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOID

KOID Risk / Return Rank: 62
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 60
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 58

HUMN

HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 31
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 29
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOID vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KOID	HUMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	0.86	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	1.35	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.17	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	1.43	+1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	3.92	+4.21

KOID vs. HUMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOID Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the HUMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOID and HUMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KOID vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOID drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum HUMN drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOID and HUMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOID	HUMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-20.40%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.19%	-20.40%	+2.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.75%	-18.09%	+7.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-5.16%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	7.41%	-1.62%

Volatility

KOID vs. HUMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) is 12.52%, while Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) has a volatility of 16.20%. This indicates that KOID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOID	HUMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.52%	16.20%	-3.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.04%	28.74%	-5.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.54%	33.86%	-6.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.95%	33.32%	-6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.95%	33.32%	-6.37%

KOID vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOID has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOID vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison

KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than HUMN's 0.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.68%	0.72%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	0.70%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOID and HUMN in my portfolio?

KOID and HUMN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOID or HUMN?

HUMN has higher volatility (16.20%) compared to KOID (12.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOID dropped -18.19% vs HUMN's -20.40%.

Which ETF is better, KOID or HUMN?

On 1-year performance, KOID leads with 46.98% vs 28.97% for HUMN. On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KOID has been the lower-risk option at 12.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOID or HUMN?

Over the 1-year period, KOID has performed better with a 46.98% return vs 28.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOID or HUMN?

KOID is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOID or HUMN?

KOID has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.68% for HUMN.

What is the main difference between KOID and HUMN?

KOID is categorized as Technology Equities, while HUMN is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KOID and 0.75% for HUMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KOID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.