KOID vs. ASMH

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - KOID tracks the MerQube Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KOID returned 42.07% vs 147.78% for ASMH. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KOID charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

KOID vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOID achieves a 21.80% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 61.20% return.

KOID

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -6.80%
• 6M: 15.15%
• YTD: 21.80%
• 1Y: 42.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.39%

ASMH

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -8.02%
• 6M: 29.69%
• YTD: 61.20%
• 1Y: 147.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 108.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	$129.75K	$234.38K	$301.43K
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF	$4.97M	$6.80M	$7.63M

KOID vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF	21.80%	27.04%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	61.20%	41.74%

Correlation

The correlation between KOID and ASMH is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.60

The correlation between KOID and ASMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KOID vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KOID

KOID Risk / Return Rank: 50
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 47
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KOID vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KOID	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	3.41	-1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	3.72	-1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.46	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	6.91	-4.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.12	24.31	-18.18

KOID vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOID Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOID and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KOID vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOID drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, smaller than the maximum ASMH drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOID and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOID	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.63%	-21.52%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.63%	-21.52%	+1.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.33%	-15.85%	+5.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-4.85%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.89%	6.10%	+0.79%

Volatility

KOID vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) is 10.63%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that KOID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOID	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.63%	12.96%	-2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.36%	34.86%	-10.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.63%	43.67%	-15.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.51%	41.62%	-14.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.51%	41.62%	-14.11%

KOID vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOID has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOID vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than ASMH's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.90%	0.19%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF	0.69%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOID and ASMH in my portfolio?

KOID and ASMH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOID or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to KOID (10.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOID dropped -19.63% vs ASMH's -21.52%.

Which ETF is better, KOID or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 147.78% vs 42.07% for KOID. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, KOID has been the lower-risk option at 10.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOID or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 147.78% return vs 42.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOID or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KOID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOID or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.69% for KOID.

What is the main difference between KOID and ASMH?

KOID tracks MerQube Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KOID and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.