PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNSA vs. COCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KNSA vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNSA achieves a 53.79% return, which is significantly higher than COCO's 34.69% return.


KNSA

1D
-2.97%
1M
22.99%
6M
48.68%
YTD
53.79%
1Y
125.85%
3Y*
65.48%
5Y*
34.30%
10Y*

COCO

1D
0.21%
1M
-9.22%
6M
29.89%
YTD
34.69%
1Y
92.66%
3Y*
42.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNSA vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KNSA
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
53.79%108.54%12.77%17.09%27.27%8.28%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
34.69%43.62%43.90%85.60%23.72%-27.33%

Correlation

The correlation between KNSA and COCO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KNSA:

$4.77B

COCO:

$4.08B

EPS

KNSA:

$0.92

COCO:

$1.38

PE Ratio

KNSA:

69.30

COCO:

51.88

PEG Ratio

KNSA:

0.67

COCO:

0.43

PS Ratio

KNSA:

6.71

COCO:

6.53

PB Ratio

KNSA:

8.63

COCO:

12.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

KNSA:

$754.05M

COCO:

$658.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KNSA:

$294.06M

COCO:

$246.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

KNSA:

$101.06M

COCO:

$100.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNSA vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNSA
KNSA Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KNSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNSA Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KNSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNSA Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

COCO
COCO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNSA vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNSACOCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.33

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.67

3.98

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.16

10.24

+9.92

KNSA vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNSA and COCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNSA vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNSA drawdown since its inception was -83.06%, which is greater than COCO's maximum drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNSA and COCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNSACOCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.06%

-56.97%

-26.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.12%

-23.23%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.14%

-38.55%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.72%

-15.02%

+9.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.34%

-16.72%

-23.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

9.02%

-3.08%

Volatility

KNSA vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA) is 14.13%, while The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) has a volatility of 18.95%. This indicates that KNSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNSACOCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.13%

18.95%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.91%

44.60%

-8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.41%

54.47%

-10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.62%

56.89%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.89%

56.89%

+7.00%

Dividends

KNSA vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither KNSA nor COCO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KNSA vs. COCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
214.27M
179.77M
(KNSA) Total Revenue
(COCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KNSA vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
40.0%
Portfolio components
KNSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.81M and revenue of 179.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

KNSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. reported an operating income of 29.27M and revenue of 214.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.58M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

KNSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. reported a net income of 22.59M and revenue of 214.27M, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.47M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KNSA and COCO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COCO has higher volatility (18.95%) compared to KNSA (14.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNSA dropped -83.06% vs COCO's -56.97%.

KNSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNSA and COCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer