PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNO vs. TARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNO vs. TARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNO achieves a 22.07% return, which is significantly higher than TARK's -24.46% return.


KNO

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.27%
6M
14.83%
YTD
22.07%
1Y
29.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.97%

TARK

1D
-4.73%
1M
-24.19%
6M
-18.59%
YTD
-24.46%
1Y
-18.26%
3Y*
1.19%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.52K$18.95K$34.06K
$604.81K$641.97K$710.94K

KNO vs. TARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KNO
AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF
22.07%19.84%-1.19%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-24.46%41.00%33.32%

Correlation

The correlation between KNO and TARK is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2024

0.61

The correlation between KNO and TARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNO vs. TARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KNO
KNO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
KNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KNO vs. TARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNOTARKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.99

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

-0.49

+3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

-0.84

+10.25

KNO vs. TARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNO Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the TARK Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNO and TARK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNO vs. TARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNO drawdown since its inception was -15.50%, smaller than the maximum TARK drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNO and TARK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNOTARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.50%

-77.82%

+62.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-57.57%

+45.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-50.30%

+46.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-50.55%

+47.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

33.47%

-30.27%

Volatility

KNO vs. TARK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) is 5.26%, while Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a volatility of 20.33%. This indicates that KNO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNOTARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

20.33%

-15.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

55.18%

-39.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

72.66%

-54.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

90.17%

-72.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

90.17%

-72.77%

KNO vs. TARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than TARK's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNO vs. TARK - Dividend Comparison

KNO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than TARK's 39.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
KNO
AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF
0.88%1.08%3.13%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
39.71%30.00%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNO and TARK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARK has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to KNO (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNO dropped -15.50% vs TARK's -77.82%.

On 1-year performance, KNO leads with 29.83% vs -18.26% for TARK. On fees, KNO is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, KNO has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KNO has performed better with a 29.83% return vs -18.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNO is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 39.71%, compared with 0.88% for KNO.

KNO is categorized as Global Equities, while TARK is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for KNO and 1.15% for TARK.

KNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNO and TARK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer