KNO vs. VT

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

KNO (AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. KNO is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past year, KNO returned 24.74% vs 19.08% for VT. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. KNO charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

KNO vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNO achieves a 20.49% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.15% return.

KNO

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -3.74%
• 6M: 13.93%
• YTD: 20.49%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.32%

VT

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 6.54%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 1Y: 19.08%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: 12.17%
• ALL TIME*: 8.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KNO AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF	$25.02K	$27.63K	$35.86K
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	$356.94M	$368.70M	$480.26M

KNO vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KNO AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF	20.49%	19.84%	-1.19%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	10.15%	22.43%	4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between KNO and VT is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2024	0.86

The correlation between KNO and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNO vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KNO	VT
Technology	38.5%	31.2%
Industrials	22.9%	11.7%
Healthcare	13.6%	8.3%
Basic Materials	6.5%	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	9.0%
Energy	4.2%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	4.5%
Financial Services	1.8%	15.7%
Utilities	1.5%	2.5%
Communication Services	1.2%	7.4%
Real Estate	0.8%	2.3%

Return for Risk

KNO vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNO

KNO Risk / Return Rank: 62
KNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
KNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
KNO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
KNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
KNO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 60
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KNO	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.39	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	1.98	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.25	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	1.98	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.88	8.32	-0.44

KNO vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNO Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNO and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KNO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNO drawdown since its inception was -15.50%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNO and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNO	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.50%	-50.27%	+34.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-9.67%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.13%	-2.73%	-2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-6.98%	+4.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	2.31%	+0.85%

Volatility

KNO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.45%. This indicates that KNO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KNO	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	3.45%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.75%	11.44%	+4.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.66%	13.78%	+3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.27%	16.19%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.27%	17.17%	+0.10%

KNO vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

KNO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

KNO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than VT's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KNO AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF	0.90%	1.08%	3.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.61%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KNO and VT in my portfolio?

KNO and VT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KNO or VT?

KNO has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to VT (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNO dropped -15.50% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, KNO or VT?

On 1-year performance, KNO leads with 24.74% vs 19.08% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KNO or VT?

Over the 1-year period, KNO has performed better with a 24.74% return vs 19.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KNO or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for KNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KNO or VT?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.90% for KNO.

What is the main difference between KNO and VT?

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for KNO and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.