PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNGZ vs. RPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNGZ vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGZ achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.55% return.


KNGZ

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
13.07%
6M
11.78%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*

RPG

1D
0.18%
1M
5.68%
YTD
30.55%
6M
27.48%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
27.80%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
15.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGZ vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
13.07%14.27%11.05%9.77%-7.55%28.99%5.51%27.34%-7.11%9.90%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
30.55%13.41%28.23%8.04%-27.55%29.40%29.34%28.34%-4.53%10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGZ and RPG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.60

The correlation between KNGZ and RPG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KNGZ vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNGZ
RPG

Financial Services

15.2%
5.3%

Technology

15.2%
46.9%

Industrials

14.1%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
14.7%

Healthcare

12.1%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
1.1%

Real Estate

6.1%
1.0%

Utilities

6.1%
2.4%

Communication Services

5.1%
5.4%

Energy

4.0%
1.6%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.2%

Financial Services

KNGZ
15.2%
RPG
5.3%

Technology

KNGZ
15.2%
RPG
46.9%

Industrials

KNGZ
14.1%
RPG
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KNGZ
12.1%
RPG
14.7%

Healthcare

KNGZ
12.1%
RPG
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

KNGZ
6.1%
RPG
1.1%

Real Estate

KNGZ
6.1%
RPG
1.0%

Utilities

KNGZ
6.1%
RPG
2.4%

Communication Services

KNGZ
5.1%
RPG
5.4%

Energy

KNGZ
4.0%
RPG
1.6%

Basic Materials

KNGZ
3.0%
RPG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNGZ vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNGZ
KNGZ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
KNGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

RPG
RPG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGZ vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNGZRPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.30

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

12.38

-4.02

KNGZ vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGZ and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNGZ vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGZ drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGZ and RPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGZRPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-53.27%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-11.08%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-24.75%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-35.59%

+15.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-4.43%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-8.83%

+3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.95%

-0.08%

Volatility

KNGZ vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) is 4.32%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that KNGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGZRPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

11.10%

-6.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

18.98%

-8.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

22.06%

-8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

23.86%

-7.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

22.89%

-4.04%

KNGZ vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNGZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNGZ vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

KNGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.40%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%0.00%0.00%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
0.15%0.24%0.25%1.44%0.74%0.00%0.46%0.83%0.47%0.56%0.43%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNGZ and RPG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to KNGZ (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNGZ dropped -37.44% vs RPG's -53.27%.

On 5-year performance, RPG leads with 11.61% vs 9.20% for KNGZ. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KNGZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RPG has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KNGZ.

KNGZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.

KNGZ is categorized as S&P 500, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. KNGZ tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KNGZ and 0.35% for RPG.

KNGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNGZ and RPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer