PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

KNGC.TO (Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF) and XCV.TO (iShares Canadian Value Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - KNGC.TO tracks the Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index while XCV.TO tracks the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KNGC.TO returned 37.43% vs 51.58% for XCV.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KNGC.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for XCV.TO.

Performance

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGC.TO achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly lower than XCV.TO's 27.97% return.

KNGC.TO

1D
-0.12%
1M
-3.40%
6M
9.46%
YTD
14.18%
1Y
37.43%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

XCV.TO

1D
0.80%
1M
4.72%
6M
26.08%
YTD
27.97%
1Y
51.58%
3Y*
29.93%
5Y*
20.61%
10Y*
13.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF		14.18%41.07%-4.91%
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF		27.97%32.30%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGC.TO and XCV.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF

iShares Canadian Value Index ETF

Often compared with KNGC.TO:
KNGC.TO vs. TULV.TOKNGC.TO vs. DMEC.TOKNGC.TO vs. ETSX.TOKNGC.TO vs. FXM.TOKNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TOKNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TOKNGC.TO vs. FCCM.NEO
Often compared with XCV.TO:
XCV.TO vs. XDIV.TOXCV.TO vs. XCS.TOXCV.TO vs. XEQT.TOXCV.TO vs. VCE.TOXCV.TO vs. DGROXCV.TO vs. FCUV.TOXCV.TO vs. CDZ.TO

Return for Risk

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KNGC.TO
KNGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
XCV.TO
XCV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

KNGC.TOXCV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.97
5.65

-2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.19
7.44

-3.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

2.16

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.63

13.50

-6.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.55

50.78

-28.24

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is lower than the XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGC.TO and XCV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, smaller than the maximum XCV.TO drawdown of -52.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGC.TO and XCV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

KNGC.TOXCV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.52%

-52.45%

+26.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-3.84%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-9.71%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-18.06%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-41.18%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

0.00%

-4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-6.58%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.02%

+0.65%

Volatility

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) at 1.98%. This indicates that KNGC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

KNGC.TOXCV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

1.98%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

6.91%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

9.18%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

12.79%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

15.50%

+2.10%

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNGC.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XCV.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

KNGC.TO vs. XCV.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than XCV.TO's 2.17% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF		1.63%1.69%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF		2.17%2.78%3.84%4.00%3.28%2.18%3.46%3.16%3.23%2.49%2.57%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

KNGC.TO and XCV.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KNGC.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KNGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for XCV.TO.

KNGC.TO tracks Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index, while XCV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Brompton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for KNGC.TO and 0.55% for XCV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNGC.TO and XCV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer