KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO).

KNGC.TO and XCSR.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KNGC.TO is a passively managed fund by Brompton that tracks the performance of the Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. It was launched on May 30, 2024. XCSR.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 15, 2020. Both KNGC.TO and XCSR.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF	17.07%	41.07%	110,085.50%
XCSR.TO iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF	-2.97%	35.35%	18.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGC.TO achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than XCSR.TO's -2.97% return.

KNGC.TO

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 26.53%
• 1Y: 63.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XCSR.TO

• 1D: 3.65%
• 1M: -5.81%
• YTD: -2.97%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: 20.64%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KNGC.TO and XCSR.TO have an expense ratio of 0.17%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

KNGC.TO

Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF

XCSR.TO

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF

Return for Risk

KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNGC.TO

KNGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
KNGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
KNGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
KNGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
KNGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

XCSR.TO

XCSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
XCSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
XCSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
XCSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
XCSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KNGC.TO	XCSR.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.06	1.79	+2.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.72	2.39	+2.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	1.35	+0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.55	2.73	+2.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	29.18	10.74	+18.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.06, which is higher than the XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGC.TO and XCSR.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KNGC.TO	XCSR.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.06	1.79	+2.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.08	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between KNGC.TO and XCSR.TO is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than XCSR.TO's 1.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF	1.31%	1.69%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XCSR.TO iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF	1.81%	1.73%	2.20%	2.61%	2.78%	1.53%	0.81%

Drawdowns

KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum XCSR.TO drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGC.TO and XCSR.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNGC.TO	XCSR.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.25%	-23.56%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.79%	-11.12%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.02%	+7.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-5.21%	+1.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.82%	-0.58%

Volatility

KNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) is 2.74%, while iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that KNGC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCSR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KNGC.TO	XCSR.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.74%	7.09%	-4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.99%	12.67%	-2.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.83%	16.58%	-0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80,206.60%	13.78%	+80,192.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80,206.60%	1,388.38%	+78,818.22%