XCV.TO vs. DGRO
XCV.TO (iShares Canadian Value Index ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCV.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCV.TO returned 13.20%/yr vs 14.12%/yr for DGRO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCV.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
XCV.TO vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCV.TO is traded in CAD, while DGRO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCV.TO achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, XCV.TO has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 13.20%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.
XCV.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- 1Y
- 44.26%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 17.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.12%
XCV.TO vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCV.TO iShares Canadian Value Index ETF | 19.17% | 32.17% | 21.26% | 9.47% | 1.87% | 32.71% | -2.56% | 18.02% | -11.15% | 8.75% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 10.15% | 10.39% | 26.64% | 8.03% | -1.35% | 25.50% | 7.65% | 23.48% | 5.90% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCV.TO and DGRO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014 | 0.40 |
The correlation between XCV.TO and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCV.TO vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
XCV.TO
DGRO
XCV.TO vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCV.TO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.03 | 1.45 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.53 | 4.04 | +7.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.47 | 16.09 | +27.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCV.TO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97 | 2.50 | +2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.39 | 1.14 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.94 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.00 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
XCV.TO vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCV.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.49%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -29.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCV.TO and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCV.TO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.49% | -29.01% | -23.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.86% | -5.99% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | -14.61% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.08% | -15.75% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.18% | -29.01% | -12.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | 0.00% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -2.82% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 1.50% | -0.48% |
Volatility
XCV.TO vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.29%. This indicates that XCV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCV.TO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 2.29% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.65% | 7.34% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.96% | 9.70% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 12.03% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 15.04% | +0.50% |
XCV.TO vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCV.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCV.TO vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
XCV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
XCV.TO iShares Canadian Value Index ETF | 2.29% | 2.71% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.18% | 2.11% | 3.35% | 3.06% | 3.13% | 2.40% | 2.50% | 3.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCV.TO and DGRO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for XCV.TO.
XCV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. XCV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XCV.TO and 0.08% for DGRO.
Find the right allocation for XCV.TO and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer