PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF (TQCD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF
17.07%41.07%110,085.50%
TQCD.TO
TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF
7.36%33.11%15.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGC.TO achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than TQCD.TO's 7.36% return.


KNGC.TO

1D
0.06%
1M
0.71%
YTD
17.07%
6M
26.53%
1Y
63.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQCD.TO

1D
1.87%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
7.36%
6M
15.97%
1Y
38.76%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
17.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNGC.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TQCD.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNGC.TO
KNGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TQCD.TO
TQCD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TQCD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF (TQCD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNGC.TOTQCD.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.06

3.01

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.72

3.72

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.62

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.55

3.72

+1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.18

19.47

+9.70

KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.06, which is higher than the TQCD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGC.TO and TQCD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNGC.TOTQCD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.06

3.01

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.70

-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between KNGC.TO and TQCD.TO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than TQCD.TO's 2.88% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF
1.31%1.69%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQCD.TO
TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF
2.88%2.95%3.47%3.73%4.03%4.09%6.20%0.39%

Drawdowns

KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum TQCD.TO drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGC.TO and TQCD.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGC.TOTQCD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-46.47%

+26.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.79%

-10.74%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.29%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-6.14%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.05%

+0.19%

Volatility

KNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) is 2.74%, while TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF (TQCD.TO) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that KNGC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQCD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KNGC.TOTQCD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

4.71%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

8.41%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

12.98%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80,206.60%

12.25%

+80,194.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80,206.60%

19.63%

+80,186.97%