XCV.TO vs. CDZ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO).
XCV.TO and CDZ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCV.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. It was launched on Nov 6, 2006. CDZ.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. It was launched on Sep 8, 2006. Both XCV.TO and CDZ.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XCV.TO or CDZ.TO.
Key characteristics
| XCV.TO | CDZ.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.07% | 4.24% |
| 1Y Return | 16.45% | 9.29% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.16% | 4.60% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.67% | 7.59% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.90% | 6.48% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.17 | 0.73 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.17% | 10.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -52.43% | -49.12% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCV.TO and CDZ.TO is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XCV.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XCV.TO achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than CDZ.TO's 4.24% return. Over the past 10 years, XCV.TO has outperformed CDZ.TO with an annualized return of 7.90%, while CDZ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCV.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCV.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CDZ.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XCV.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XCV.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Dividend Comparison
XCV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than CDZ.TO's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCV.TO iShares Canadian Value Index ETF | 3.76% | 4.00% | 3.28% | 2.18% | 3.46% | 3.16% | 3.23% | 2.48% | 2.58% | 3.24% | 6.55% | 2.85% |
CDZ.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF | 3.93% | 3.92% | 3.89% | 3.12% | 3.92% | 3.90% | 4.62% | 3.63% | 3.71% | 3.94% | 7.64% | 3.42% |
Drawdowns
XCV.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCV.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.43%, which is greater than CDZ.TO's maximum drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCV.TO and CDZ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XCV.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) is 2.84%, while iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that XCV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.