PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNCT vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNCT vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 40.12% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 2.89% return. Over the past 10 years, KNCT has outperformed XLG with an annualized return of 18.83%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.35% annualized return.


KNCT

1D
0.08%
1M
-4.96%
6M
31.73%
YTD
40.12%
1Y
63.92%
3Y*
33.13%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
18.83%
ALL TIME*
13.22%

XLG

1D
1.06%
1M
0.07%
6M
3.36%
YTD
2.89%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
16.35%
ALL TIME*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$741.37K$822.66K$837.91K
$61.04M$60.71M$102.52M

KNCT vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
40.12%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
2.89%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%24.15%32.04%-3.59%23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KNCT and XLG is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005

0.71

The correlation between KNCT and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNCT vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNCT
XLG

Technology

86.3%
49.8%

Communication Services

10.0%
13.0%

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Industrials

0.7%
1.9%

Financial Services

0.2%
10.3%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.1%

Energy

-

2.5%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Technology

KNCT
86.3%
XLG
49.8%

Communication Services

KNCT
10.0%
XLG
13.0%

Real Estate

KNCT
3.0%
XLG

-

Industrials

KNCT
0.7%
XLG
1.9%

Financial Services

KNCT
0.2%
XLG
10.3%

Basic Materials

KNCT

-

XLG
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

KNCT

-

XLG
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

KNCT

-

XLG
5.1%

Energy

KNCT

-

XLG
2.5%

Healthcare

KNCT

-

XLG
6.8%

Utilities

KNCT

-

XLG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNCT vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KNCT
KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KNCT vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNCTXLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.17

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.10

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

3.41

+9.92

KNCT vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNCT and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNCT vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and XLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNCTXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-52.39%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.91%

-12.41%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-20.70%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-28.02%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-30.46%

-4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.80%

-5.74%

-9.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-7.62%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

3.98%

+0.70%

Volatility

KNCT vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.03%. This indicates that KNCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNCTXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.26%

5.03%

+6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.68%

11.54%

+13.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.67%

14.75%

+12.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

18.89%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.55%

18.92%

+4.63%

KNCT vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNCT vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than XLG's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.68%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.65%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNCT and XLG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNCT has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to XLG (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs XLG's -52.39%.

On 10-year performance, KNCT leads with 18.83% vs 16.35% for XLG. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 16.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.

KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.65% for XLG.

KNCT is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.20% for XLG.

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNCT and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer