PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNCT vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNCT vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, KNCT has outperformed XLG with an annualized return of 21.42%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.27% annualized return.


KNCT

1D
-0.63%
1M
26.38%
YTD
63.41%
6M
62.53%
1Y
99.38%
3Y*
43.36%
5Y*
21.73%
10Y*
21.42%

XLG

1D
-1.15%
1M
4.22%
YTD
7.57%
6M
7.32%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
17.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNCT vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
63.41%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
7.57%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%24.15%32.04%-3.59%23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KNCT and XLG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005

0.71

The correlation between KNCT and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNCT vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNCT
XLG

Technology

80.8%
43.9%

Communication Services

14.0%
17.1%

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Industrials

1.1%
1.9%

Financial Services

0.2%
9.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.8%

Energy

-

2.7%

Healthcare

-

7.0%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

KNCT
80.8%
XLG
43.9%

Communication Services

KNCT
14.0%
XLG
17.1%

Real Estate

KNCT
4.1%
XLG

-

Industrials

KNCT
1.1%
XLG
1.9%

Financial Services

KNCT
0.2%
XLG
9.6%

Basic Materials

KNCT

-

XLG
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

KNCT

-

XLG
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

KNCT

-

XLG
5.8%

Energy

KNCT

-

XLG
2.7%

Healthcare

KNCT

-

XLG
7.0%

Utilities

KNCT

-

XLG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNCT vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNCT
KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNCT vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNCTXLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.38

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.00

2.31

+7.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.01

8.66

+35.35

KNCT vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNCT Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNCT and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNCTXLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70

2.15

+2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.87

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.92

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.62

-0.05

Drawdowns

KNCT vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and XLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNCTXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-52.39%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-12.41%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-20.70%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-28.02%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-30.46%

-4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-1.44%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-7.64%

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

3.30%

-1.03%

Volatility

KNCT vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 3.19%. This indicates that KNCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNCTXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

3.19%

+6.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

9.80%

+7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.28%

13.33%

+7.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

18.68%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

18.84%

+4.13%

KNCT vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNCT vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than XLG's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.57%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNCT and XLG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNCT has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs XLG's -52.39%.

On 10-year performance, KNCT leads with 21.42% vs 17.27% for XLG. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 17.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.

XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.57% for KNCT.

KNCT is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.20% for XLG.

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNCT and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer