KMT vs. AFYA
KMT (Kennametal Inc.) and AFYA (Afya Limited) are both stocks. KMT operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials), while AFYA operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, KMT returned 3.25%/yr vs -11.44%/yr for AFYA. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMT vs. AFYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMT achieves a 26.04% return, which is significantly higher than AFYA's -3.78% return.
KMT
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 26.04%
- 6M
- 22.55%
- 1Y
- 66.70%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
AFYA
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -3.78%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- -13.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- -11.44%
- 10Y*
- —
KMT vs. AFYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMT Kennametal Inc. | 26.04% | 22.58% | -3.95% | 10.48% | -30.97% | 1.20% | 1.08% | 10.09% |
AFYA Afya Limited | -3.78% | -1.70% | -27.59% | 40.40% | -0.57% | -37.91% | -6.71% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMT and AFYA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2019 | 0.22 |
The correlation between KMT and AFYA shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KMT:
$2.74B
AFYA:
$1.28B
KMT:
$1.78
AFYA:
R$8.30
KMT:
19.92
AFYA:
8.81
KMT:
0.60
AFYA:
0.22
KMT:
1.28
AFYA:
1.77
KMT:
1.96
AFYA:
1.41
KMT:
$2.14B
AFYA:
R$3.77B
KMT:
$682.06M
AFYA:
R$2.42B
KMT:
$249.28M
AFYA:
R$1.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMT vs. AFYA — Risk / Return Rank
KMT
AFYA
KMT vs. AFYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kennametal Inc. (KMT) and Afya Limited (AFYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMT | AFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.94 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | -0.52 | +3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.81 | -0.80 | +6.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMT vs. AFYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMT drawdown since its inception was -70.10%, roughly equal to the maximum AFYA drawdown of -72.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMT and AFYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMT | AFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.10% | -72.09% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.25% | -27.05% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.95% | -40.41% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.70% | -67.60% | +14.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.65% | -53.52% | +35.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.56% | -43.18% | +18.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.51% | 17.44% | -5.93% |
Volatility
KMT vs. AFYA - Volatility Comparison
Kennametal Inc. (KMT) has a higher volatility of 13.07% compared to Afya Limited (AFYA) at 7.35%. This indicates that KMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMT | AFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.07% | 7.35% | +5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.36% | 21.97% | +12.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.10% | 27.88% | +18.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.00% | 40.12% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.00% | 47.05% | -6.05% |
Dividends
KMT vs. AFYA - Dividend Comparison
KMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than AFYA's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFYA Afya Limited | 4.62% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMT Kennametal Inc. | 2.26% | 2.82% | 3.33% | 3.10% | 3.33% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.40% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 3.96% |
Financials
KMT vs. AFYA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kennametal Inc. and Afya Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMT vs. AFYA - Profitability Comparison
KMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kennametal Inc. reported a gross profit of 206.38M and revenue of 592.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
AFYA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Afya Limited reported a gross profit of 685.00M and revenue of 993.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.
KMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kennametal Inc. reported an operating income of 79.43M and revenue of 592.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
AFYA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Afya Limited reported an operating income of 385.21M and revenue of 993.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.8%.
KMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kennametal Inc. reported a net income of 58.23M and revenue of 592.61M, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.
AFYA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Afya Limited reported a net income of 252.21M and revenue of 993.76M, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMT and AFYA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMT has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to AFYA (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMT dropped -70.10% vs AFYA's -72.09%.
KMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMT and AFYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer