PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFYA vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AFYA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Afya Limited (AFYA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFYA achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 19.48% return.


AFYA

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.67%
YTD
-2.42%
6M
-0.94%
1Y
-18.81%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
-9.53%
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-0.69%
1M
12.28%
YTD
19.48%
6M
22.81%
1Y
62.23%
3Y*
78.33%
5Y*
67.45%
10Y*
69.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFYA vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AFYA
Afya Limited
-2.42%-1.70%-27.59%40.40%-0.57%-37.91%-6.71%13.73%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
19.48%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%39.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AFYA and NVDA is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2019

0.22

Over the past year, the correlation between AFYA and NVDA has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AFYA:

$1.30B

NVDA:

$5.43T

EPS

AFYA:

$8.30

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

AFYA:

1.74

NVDA:

34.15

PEG Ratio

AFYA:

0.04

NVDA:

0.19

PS Ratio

AFYA:

0.35

NVDA:

21.50

PB Ratio

AFYA:

0.28

NVDA:

27.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

AFYA:

$3.77B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AFYA:

$2.42B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

AFYA:

$1.57B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFYA vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFYA
AFYA Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFYA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Afya Limited (AFYA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFYANVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.67

1.84

-2.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.77

2.47

-3.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.30

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

3.21

-3.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.92

7.92

-8.84

AFYA vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFYA Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFYA and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFYANVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

1.84

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

1.31

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.63

-0.77

Drawdowns

AFYA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFYA drawdown since its inception was -72.09%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFYA and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFYANVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.09%

-89.72%

+17.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.86%

-20.21%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.41%

-36.88%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.60%

-66.34%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.87%

-5.48%

-47.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.13%

-36.21%

-6.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.01%

8.20%

+10.81%

Volatility

AFYA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Afya Limited (AFYA) is 7.20%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that AFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFYANVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

11.79%

-4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.82%

25.29%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.35%

34.03%

-5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.19%

51.66%

-11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.20%

49.80%

-2.60%

Dividends

AFYA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

AFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFYA
Afya Limited
4.56%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

AFYA vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Afya Limited and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
993.76M
81.62B
(AFYA) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AFYA vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Afya Limited and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
68.9%
74.9%
Portfolio components
AFYA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Afya Limited reported a gross profit of 685.00M and revenue of 993.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

AFYA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Afya Limited reported an operating income of 385.21M and revenue of 993.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.8%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

AFYA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Afya Limited reported a net income of 252.21M and revenue of 993.76M, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AFYA and NVDA have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to AFYA (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFYA dropped -72.09% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFYA and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer