PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMT vs. ONDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KMT vs. ONDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kennametal Inc. (KMT) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMT achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly higher than ONDS's -25.61% return.


KMT

1D
1.39%
1M
-3.95%
6M
10.48%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
39.88%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
6.72%

ONDS

1D
-5.10%
1M
-22.19%
6M
-46.97%
YTD
-25.61%
1Y
242.45%
3Y*
76.52%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMT vs. ONDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
19.50%22.58%-3.95%10.48%-30.97%1.20%1.08%13.49%0.70%
ONDS
Ondas Holdings Inc.
-25.61%281.25%67.32%-3.77%-76.30%-28.08%-48.17%0.00%33.33%

Correlation

The correlation between KMT and ONDS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMT:

$2.56B

ONDS:

$3.80B

EPS

KMT:

$1.78

ONDS:

$1.52

PE Ratio

KMT:

18.89

ONDS:

4.79

PS Ratio

KMT:

1.21

ONDS:

12.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMT:

$2.14B

ONDS:

$96.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMT:

$682.06M

ONDS:

$43.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

KMT:

$249.28M

ONDS:

-$75.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMT vs. ONDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMT
KMT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
KMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
KMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ONDS
ONDS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ONDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONDS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ONDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONDS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMT vs. ONDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kennametal Inc. (KMT) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMTONDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

4.93

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

9.95

-6.75

KMT vs. ONDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the ONDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMT and ONDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMT vs. ONDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMT drawdown since its inception was -70.10%, smaller than the maximum ONDS drawdown of -98.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMT and ONDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMTONDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.10%

-98.28%

+28.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.25%

-53.37%

+27.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.95%

-83.28%

+40.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.70%

-96.99%

+44.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.93%

-62.77%

+40.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.55%

-71.26%

+46.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.40%

26.38%

-13.98%

Volatility

KMT vs. ONDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kennametal Inc. (KMT) is 11.14%, while Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) has a volatility of 19.80%. This indicates that KMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMTONDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.14%

19.80%

-8.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.37%

72.50%

-37.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.40%

125.89%

-79.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.11%

113.94%

-76.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.87%

120.27%

-79.40%

Dividends

KMT vs. ONDS - Dividend Comparison

KMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while ONDS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
2.38%2.82%3.33%3.10%3.33%2.23%2.21%2.17%2.40%1.65%2.56%3.96%
ONDS
Ondas Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KMT vs. ONDS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kennametal Inc. and Ondas Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
592.61M
50.12M
(KMT) Total Revenue
(ONDS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KMT and ONDS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONDS has higher volatility (19.80%) compared to KMT (11.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMT dropped -70.10% vs ONDS's -98.28%.

ONDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMT and ONDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer