AFYA vs. WMG
AFYA (Afya Limited) and WMG (Warner Music Group Corp.) are both stocks. AFYA operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while WMG operates in Entertainment (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, AFYA returned -9.02%/yr vs -1.48%/yr for WMG. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AFYA vs. WMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFYA achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly higher than WMG's -2.92% return.
AFYA
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- -16.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.83%
- 5Y*
- -9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
WMG
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- -2.92%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 16.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- —
AFYA vs. WMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFYA Afya Limited | -1.74% | -1.70% | -27.59% | 40.40% | -0.57% | -37.91% | 19.96% |
WMG Warner Music Group Corp. | -2.92% | 1.36% | -11.48% | 4.44% | -17.21% | 15.31% | 27.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFYA and WMG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
AFYA:
$8.30
WMG:
$1.16
AFYA:
1.75
WMG:
25.37
AFYA:
0.04
WMG:
2.22
AFYA:
0.35
WMG:
1.61
AFYA:
$3.77B
WMG:
$7.13B
AFYA:
$2.42B
WMG:
$3.17B
AFYA:
$1.57B
WMG:
$1.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFYA vs. WMG — Risk / Return Rank
AFYA
WMG
AFYA vs. WMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Afya Limited (AFYA) and Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFYA | WMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | 0.53 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | 0.93 | -1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.12 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 0.55 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 1.38 | -2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFYA | WMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 0.53 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | -0.04 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.05 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
AFYA vs. WMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFYA drawdown since its inception was -72.09%, which is greater than WMG's maximum drawdown of -54.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFYA and WMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFYA | WMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.09% | -54.04% | -18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.86% | -30.04% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.41% | -33.06% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.60% | -54.04% | -13.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.54% | -34.11% | -18.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -27.01% | -16.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.95% | 11.90% | +7.05% |
Volatility
AFYA vs. WMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Afya Limited (AFYA) is 7.20%, while Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) has a volatility of 13.87%. This indicates that AFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFYA | WMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 13.87% | -6.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.83% | 25.71% | -3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.31% | 31.12% | -2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.19% | 34.74% | +5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.19% | 34.94% | +12.25% |
Dividends
AFYA vs. WMG - Dividend Comparison
AFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than WMG's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFYA Afya Limited | 4.52% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMG Warner Music Group Corp. | 2.58% | 2.41% | 2.26% | 1.84% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 0.63% |
Financials
AFYA vs. WMG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Afya Limited and Warner Music Group Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AFYA vs. WMG - Profitability Comparison
AFYA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Afya Limited reported a gross profit of 685.00M and revenue of 993.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.
WMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warner Music Group Corp. reported a gross profit of 802.00M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.3%.
AFYA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Afya Limited reported an operating income of 385.21M and revenue of 993.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.8%.
WMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warner Music Group Corp. reported an operating income of 264.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
AFYA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Afya Limited reported a net income of 252.21M and revenue of 993.76M, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.
WMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warner Music Group Corp. reported a net income of 183.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AFYA and WMG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMG has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to AFYA (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFYA dropped -72.09% vs WMG's -54.04%.
WMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFYA and WMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer