PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMT vs. NWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KMT vs. NWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kennametal Inc. (KMT) and NatWest Group plc (NWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMT achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly higher than NWG's 5.84% return. Over the past 10 years, KMT has underperformed NWG with an annualized return of 6.72%, while NWG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.85% annualized return.


KMT

1D
1.39%
1M
-3.95%
6M
10.48%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
39.88%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
6.72%

NWG

1D
0.00%
1M
7.12%
6M
7.32%
YTD
5.84%
1Y
42.15%
3Y*
52.88%
5Y*
33.90%
10Y*
19.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMT vs. NWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
19.50%22.58%-3.95%10.48%-30.97%1.20%1.08%13.49%-29.88%58.13%
NWG
NatWest Group plc
5.84%81.29%92.31%-4.69%11.23%39.24%-24.92%29.18%-26.25%38.16%

Correlation

The correlation between KMT and NWG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2007

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMT:

$2.56B

NWG:

$35.34B

EPS

KMT:

$1.78

NWG:

£2.96

PE Ratio

KMT:

18.89

NWG:

4.47

PEG Ratio

KMT:

0.57

NWG:

0.17

PS Ratio

KMT:

1.21

NWG:

0.91

PB Ratio

KMT:

1.86

NWG:

0.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMT:

$2.14B

NWG:

£29.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMT:

$682.06M

NWG:

£16.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

KMT:

$249.28M

NWG:

£9.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMT vs. NWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMT
KMT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
KMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
KMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

NWG
NWG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMT vs. NWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kennametal Inc. (KMT) and NatWest Group plc (NWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMTNWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.61

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

4.01

-0.81

KMT vs. NWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the NWG Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMT and NWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMT vs. NWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMT drawdown since its inception was -70.10%, smaller than the maximum NWG drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMT and NWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMTNWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.10%

-96.96%

+26.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.25%

-24.03%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.95%

-34.62%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.70%

-40.56%

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.28%

-67.34%

-1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.93%

-68.13%

+46.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.55%

-86.12%

+61.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.40%

9.63%

+2.77%

Volatility

KMT vs. NWG - Volatility Comparison

Kennametal Inc. (KMT) has a higher volatility of 11.14% compared to NatWest Group plc (NWG) at 9.36%. This indicates that KMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMTNWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.14%

9.36%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.37%

24.81%

+10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.40%

31.17%

+15.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.11%

33.56%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.87%

36.67%

+4.20%

Dividends

KMT vs. NWG - Dividend Comparison

KMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than NWG's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
2.38%2.82%3.33%3.10%3.33%2.23%2.21%2.17%2.40%1.65%2.56%3.96%
NWG
NatWest Group plc
4.93%3.69%4.36%9.42%11.57%2.74%4.59%9.75%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KMT vs. NWG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kennametal Inc. and NatWest Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
592.61M
7.39B
(KMT) Total Revenue
(NWG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. KMT values in USD, NWG values in GBP

KMT vs. NWG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kennametal Inc. and NatWest Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
34.8%
59.0%
Portfolio components
KMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kennametal Inc. reported a gross profit of 206.38M and revenue of 592.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

NWG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.36B and revenue of 7.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.

KMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kennametal Inc. reported an operating income of 79.43M and revenue of 592.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

NWG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NatWest Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

KMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kennametal Inc. reported a net income of 58.23M and revenue of 592.61M, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.

NWG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a net income of 1.51B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in a net margin of 20.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMT and NWG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMT has higher volatility (11.14%) compared to NWG (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMT dropped -70.10% vs NWG's -96.96%.

NWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMT and NWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer