PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLM vs. KARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMLM vs. KARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than KARS's 3.68% return.


KMLM

1D
-1.30%
1M
-6.21%
YTD
5.59%
6M
5.76%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
-1.13%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*

KARS

1D
-1.29%
1M
-10.78%
YTD
3.68%
6M
2.48%
1Y
42.96%
3Y*
2.54%
5Y*
-5.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLM vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
5.59%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.74%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
3.68%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLM and KARS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020

-0.08

The correlation between KMLM and KARS shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (5 years) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMLM vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLM vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMLMKARSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.59

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

9.30

-4.84

KMLM vs. KARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMLM Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the KARS Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMLM and KARS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMLM vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -27.47%, smaller than the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and KARS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLMKARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.47%

-64.85%

+37.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-16.69%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-47.79%

+25.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-64.85%

+37.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.67%

-36.80%

+19.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.76%

-28.34%

+15.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

4.63%

-2.19%

Volatility

KMLM vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) is 3.12%, while KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that KMLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMLMKARSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

11.60%

-8.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

21.26%

-11.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

27.83%

-16.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

30.09%

-15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

29.41%

-14.72%

KMLM vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMLM vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison

KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than KARS's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.18%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.76%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KMLM and KARS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KARS has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to KMLM (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMLM dropped -27.47% vs KARS's -64.85%.

On 5-year performance, KMLM leads with 4.07% vs -5.08% for KARS. On fees, KARS is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, KMLM has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KMLM has performed better with a 4.07% return vs -5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KARS is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.

KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 0.18% for KARS.

KMLM is categorized as Systematic Trend, while KARS is Industrials Equities. KMLM tracks KFA MLM Index, while KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for KMLM and 0.72% for KARS.

KARS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMLM and KARS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer