KMLM vs. HUMN

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KMLM is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index, while HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill. KMLM is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. KMLM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.

Performance

KMLM vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than HUMN's 18.42% return.

KMLM

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -5.80%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 9.68%
• 1Y: 13.24%
• 3Y*: -1.51%
• 5Y*: 4.11%
• 10Y*: —

HUMN

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -4.59%
• YTD: 18.42%
• 6M: 21.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLM vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF	8.32%	4.58%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	18.42%	20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLM and HUMN is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

KMLM vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLM

KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 36
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 32
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 41

HUMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLM vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KMLM	HUMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.86	—	—

Drawdowns

KMLM vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -27.47%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and HUMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMLM	HUMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.47%	-20.40%	-7.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.54%	-9.15%	-6.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.74%	-4.55%	-8.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KMLM	HUMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.50%	30.67%	-19.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.62%	30.67%	-16.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.71%	30.67%	-15.96%

KMLM vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

KMLM vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison

KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than HUMN's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.61%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF	4.64%	5.02%	0.82%	0.00%	13.22%	6.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMLM and HUMN in my portfolio?

KMLM and HUMN have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KMLM or HUMN?

On fees, HUMN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KMLM or HUMN?

HUMN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KMLM or HUMN?

KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.61% for HUMN.

What is the main difference between KMLM and HUMN?

KMLM is categorized as Systematic Trend, while HUMN is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for KMLM and 0.75% for HUMN.