PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLI vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMLI vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -44.90% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 753.04% return.


KMLI

1D
-5.19%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
-44.90%
6M
-44.26%
1Y
-70.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
1.08%
1M
6.51%
YTD
753.04%
6M
785.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLI vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KMLI
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF
-44.90%-7.86%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
753.04%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLI and LINT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.09

KMLI vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KMLI
LINT

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

KMLI
100.0%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

KMLI

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

KMLI

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

KMLI

-

LINT

-

Energy

KMLI

-

LINT

-

Financial Services

KMLI

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

KMLI

-

LINT

-

Industrials

KMLI

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

KMLI

-

LINT

-

Technology

KMLI

-

LINT
100.0%

Utilities

KMLI

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMLI vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLI
KMLI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
KMLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLI vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMLILINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

KMLI vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMLI vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLILINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.23%

-49.54%

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.64%

-12.02%

-59.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-20.37%

-22.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.16%

Volatility

KMLI vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMLILINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.30%

167.69%

-88.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.90%

167.69%

-88.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.90%

167.69%

-88.79%

KMLI vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMLI vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.29%, more than LINT's 0.32% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMLI and LINT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KMLI.

KMLI has the higher dividend yield at 19.29%, compared with 0.32% for LINT.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMLI and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer