KMLI vs. KWEB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KMLI (KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KMLI is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. KMLI is actively managed, while KWEB is passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KMLI charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

KMLI vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -42.98% return, which is significantly lower than KWEB's -20.32% return.

KMLI

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -22.77%
• YTD: -42.98%
• 6M: -50.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KWEB

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -4.91%
• YTD: -20.32%
• 6M: -22.46%
• 1Y: -15.17%
• 3Y*: 4.22%
• 5Y*: -14.33%
• 10Y*: -0.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLI vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KMLI KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF	-42.98%	-37.98%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-20.32%	3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLI and KWEB is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.24

KMLI vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KMLI	KWEB
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	37.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	24.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.1%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	2.2%
Healthcare	-	6.0%
Industrials	-	3.1%
Real Estate	-	5.2%
Technology	-	17.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KMLI vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 5
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLI vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KMLI	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.83	0.06	-0.89

Drawdowns

KMLI vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMLI	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.23%	-80.92%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-72.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.65%	-68.62%	-2.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.03%	-35.25%	-5.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KMLI	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.26%	27.25%	+52.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.26%	47.67%	+31.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.26%	39.98%	+39.28%

KMLI vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

KMLI vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.64%, more than KWEB's 7.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KMLI KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF	18.64%	10.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.73%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMLI and KWEB in my portfolio?

KMLI and KWEB have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KMLI or KWEB?

On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KMLI or KWEB?

KWEB is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KMLI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KMLI or KWEB?

KMLI has the higher dividend yield at 18.64%, compared with 7.73% for KWEB.

What is the main difference between KMLI and KWEB?

KMLI is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KWEB is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 0.70% for KWEB.