PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMI vs. EPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KMI vs. EPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMI achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly lower than EPD's 19.79% return. Over the past 10 years, KMI has outperformed EPD with an annualized return of 11.73%, while EPD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.


KMI

1D
1.85%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
18.40%
6M
21.76%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
29.74%
5Y*
17.07%
10Y*
11.73%

EPD

1D
-0.08%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
19.79%
6M
19.53%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMI vs. EPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
18.40%4.74%64.42%4.10%21.23%23.75%-30.77%44.43%-11.18%-10.56%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
19.79%9.45%28.00%17.71%18.32%21.40%-23.61%21.88%-1.32%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between KMI and EPD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2011

0.59

The correlation between KMI and EPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMI:

$71.07B

EPD:

$81.47B

EPS

KMI:

$1.53

EPD:

$2.69

PE Ratio

KMI:

20.88

EPD:

13.83

PEG Ratio

KMI:

1.27

EPD:

2.22

PS Ratio

KMI:

4.05

EPD:

1.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMI:

$17.52B

EPD:

$51.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMI:

$5.86B

EPD:

$7.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

KMI:

$6.90B

EPD:

$10.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMI vs. EPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMI
KMI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
KMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
KMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EPD
EPD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPD Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMI vs. EPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMIEPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.24

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

9.50

-5.87

KMI vs. EPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the EPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMI and EPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMI vs. EPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMI drawdown since its inception was -72.70%, which is greater than EPD's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMI and EPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMIEPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.70%

-58.78%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-7.56%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-15.40%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.31%

-18.06%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.13%

-58.04%

+2.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-6.41%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.06%

-10.22%

-21.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

2.58%

+3.02%

Volatility

KMI vs. EPD - Volatility Comparison

Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) at 6.00%. This indicates that KMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMIEPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

6.00%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

13.27%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.34%

15.90%

+4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.61%

17.23%

+5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.71%

24.14%

+3.57%

Dividends

KMI vs. EPD - Dividend Comparison

KMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than EPD's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
5.88%6.74%6.63%7.51%7.79%8.20%9.09%6.23%6.97%6.29%5.88%5.90%
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
3.68%4.24%4.18%6.38%6.10%6.76%7.59%4.49%4.71%2.77%2.41%12.94%

Financials

KMI vs. EPD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinder Morgan, Inc. and Enterprise Products Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20222023202420252026
4.83B
14.39B
(KMI) Total Revenue
(EPD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KMI vs. EPD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinder Morgan, Inc. and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
13.1%
Portfolio components
KMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EPD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 14.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.

KMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.44B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

EPD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 1.82B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

KMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a net income of 1.06B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.

EPD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMI and EPD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMI has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to EPD (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMI dropped -72.70% vs EPD's -58.78%.

EPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMI and EPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer