KMCA vs. FLKR

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

KMCA (PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both South Korea Equities funds - KMCA tracks the Akros Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index while FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. KMCA charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

KMCA vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF (KMCA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KMCA

• 1D: -2.42%
• 1M: -18.16%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FLKR

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -18.04%
• 6M: 38.04%
• YTD: 65.48%
• 1Y: 121.33%
• 3Y*: 36.96%
• 5Y*: 14.32%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	$49.11M	$44.95M	$49.78M
KMCA PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF	$196.23K	$272.35K	$280.66K

KMCA vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
KMCA PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF	-25.65%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	-10.17%

Correlation

The correlation between KMCA and FLKR is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026	0.86

Return for Risk

KMCA vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMCA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 88
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMCA vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF (KMCA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KMCA	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.36	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.65	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.59	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.79	—

Drawdowns

KMCA vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMCA drawdown since its inception was -30.84%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMCA and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMCA	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.84%	-50.06%	+19.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.59%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.59%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.84%	-26.59%	-4.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.24%	-21.94%	+8.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KMCA	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	48.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.62%	51.73%	+20.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.62%	31.59%	+41.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.62%	29.45%	+43.17%

KMCA vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMCA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

KMCA vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

KMCA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.79%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%
KMCA PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMCA and FLKR in my portfolio?

KMCA and FLKR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KMCA or FLKR?

On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KMCA or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KMCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KMCA or FLKR?

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.00% for KMCA.

What is the main difference between KMCA and FLKR?

KMCA tracks Akros Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KMCA and 0.09% for FLKR.