KMB vs. TMUS
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.95%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for TMUS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 0.95%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
TMUS
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
KMB vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -5.91% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and TMUS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$34.08B
TMUS:
$208.40B
KMB:
$5.93
TMUS:
$9.41
KMB:
17.26
TMUS:
20.09
KMB:
2.98
TMUS:
0.31
KMB:
2.06
TMUS:
2.34
KMB:
18.98
TMUS:
3.73
KMB:
$16.54B
TMUS:
$90.53B
KMB:
$5.93B
TMUS:
$34.92B
KMB:
$3.07B
TMUS:
$28.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
TMUS
KMB vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.91 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.52 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -0.88 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and TMUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -86.29% | +49.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -30.37% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -33.65% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -33.65% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -33.65% | -0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -29.12% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -25.96% | +17.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 17.87% | +1.56% |
Volatility
KMB vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) at 7.72%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 7.72% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 19.08% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 24.99% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 23.90% | -3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 26.08% | -5.01% |
Dividends
KMB vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than TMUS's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.08% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KMB vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. TMUS - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
TMUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
TMUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
TMUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and TMUS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to TMUS (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs TMUS's -86.29%.
TMUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and TMUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer