KMB vs. OTIS
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and OTIS (Otis Worldwide Corporation) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while OTIS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, KMB returned -0.92%/yr vs -0.99%/yr for OTIS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. OTIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than OTIS's -18.14% return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
OTIS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -18.14%
- 6M
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -24.67%
- 3Y*
- -5.09%
- 5Y*
- -0.99%
- 10Y*
- —
KMB vs. OTIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 2.61% |
OTIS Otis Worldwide Corporation | -18.14% | -3.99% | 5.17% | 16.04% | -8.76% | 30.41% | 70.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and OTIS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2020 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$34.08B
OTIS:
$27.56B
KMB:
$5.93
OTIS:
$3.77
KMB:
17.26
OTIS:
18.79
KMB:
2.98
OTIS:
3.25
KMB:
2.06
OTIS:
1.90
KMB:
$16.54B
OTIS:
$14.65B
KMB:
$5.93B
OTIS:
$4.45B
KMB:
$3.07B
OTIS:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. OTIS — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
OTIS
KMB vs. OTIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | OTIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.81 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.85 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -1.69 | +0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. OTIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than OTIS's maximum drawdown of -32.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and OTIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | OTIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -32.44% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -30.00% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -32.44% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -32.44% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -31.07% | +4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -8.99% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 15.14% | +4.29% |
Volatility
KMB vs. OTIS - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) at 5.68%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OTIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | OTIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 5.68% | +2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 16.38% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 23.57% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 22.11% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 25.85% | -4.78% |
Dividends
KMB vs. OTIS - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than OTIS's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
OTIS Otis Worldwide Corporation | 2.40% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.46% | 1.42% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KMB vs. OTIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Otis Worldwide Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. OTIS - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
OTIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Otis Worldwide Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.3%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
OTIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Otis Worldwide Corporation reported an operating income of 539.00M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
OTIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Otis Worldwide Corporation reported a net income of 340.00M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and OTIS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to OTIS (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs OTIS's -32.44%.
KMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and OTIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer