KMB vs. NVDA
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.95%/yr vs 67.95%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 0.95%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -19.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
KMB vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and NVDA is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.11 |
The correlation between KMB and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (3 years) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KMB:
$34.08B
NVDA:
$5.00T
KMB:
$5.93
NVDA:
$6.53
KMB:
17.26
NVDA:
31.44
KMB:
2.98
NVDA:
0.17
KMB:
2.06
NVDA:
19.80
KMB:
18.98
NVDA:
25.60
KMB:
$16.54B
NVDA:
$253.49B
KMB:
$5.93B
NVDA:
$187.95B
KMB:
$3.07B
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
NVDA
KMB vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.21 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 2.07 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 4.94 | -5.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -89.72% | +52.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -20.21% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -36.88% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -66.34% | +32.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -66.34% | +32.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -12.86% | -13.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -36.18% | +27.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 8.46% | +10.97% |
Volatility
KMB vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.42%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 13.26% | -4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 26.67% | -10.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 35.00% | -9.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 51.76% | -31.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 49.84% | -28.77% |
Dividends
KMB vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
KMB vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and NVDA have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer