KMB vs. KR
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and KR (The Kroger Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KMB in Household & Personal Products, KR in Grocery Stores. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.60%/yr vs 7.71%/yr for KR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. KR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than KR's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed KR with an annualized return of 0.60%, while KR has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- -23.22%
- 3Y*
- -6.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.75%
- 10Y*
- 0.60%
KR
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- -2.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
KMB vs. KR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -0.57% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
KR The Kroger Co. | 1.81% | 4.25% | 36.91% | 4.99% | 0.44% | 45.41% | 11.90% | 7.90% | 2.08% | -18.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and KR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$5.93
KR:
$1.20
KMB:
16.49
KR:
52.67
KMB:
2.85
KR:
7.64
KMB:
1.97
KR:
0.28
KMB:
$16.54B
KR:
$147.23B
KMB:
$5.93B
KR:
$33.42B
KMB:
$3.07B
KR:
$5.29B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. KR — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
KR
KMB vs. KR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and The Kroger Co. (KR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KMB | KR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.01 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.15 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.29 | -0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KMB | KR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | -0.10 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.48 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.27 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.36 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
KMB vs. KR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum KR drawdown of -66.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and KR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | KR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -66.81% | +29.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -19.44% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -19.44% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -31.07% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -46.25% | +12.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.78% | -16.28% | -13.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -22.44% | +13.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.23% | 9.96% | +9.27% |
Volatility
KMB vs. KR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.66%, while The Kroger Co. (KR) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | KR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.66% | 9.14% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.47% | 20.12% | -3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.63% | 27.52% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 26.86% | -6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 28.95% | -7.89% |
Dividends
KMB vs. KR - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than KR's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.20% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
KR The Kroger Co. | 2.22% | 2.14% | 2.00% | 2.41% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 1.93% | 1.79% | 1.30% | 0.94% |
Financials
KMB vs. KR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Kroger Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. KR - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
KR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 7.12B and revenue of 33.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
KR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of -1.54B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
KR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of -1.32B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and KR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KR has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to KMB (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs KR's -66.81%.
KR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and KR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer